RF resonators and filters

ABSTRACT

A filter package comprising an array of piezoelectric films sandwiched between an array of upper electrodes and lower electrodes:
     the individual piezoelectric films and the upper electrodes being separated by a passivation material; the lower electrode being coupled to an interposer with a first cavity between the lower electrodes and the interposer; the filter package further comprising a silicon wafer of known thickness attached over the upper electrodes with an array of upper cavities between the silicon wafer and a silicon cover; each upper cavity aligned with a piezoelectric film in the array of piezoelectric films, the upper cavities having side walls comprising the passivation material.

BACKGROUND

Mobile phone users require quality reception and transmission over awide area. The quality of the radio frequency (RF) signal depends on theRF filters in the mobile phone. Each RF filter passes desiredfrequencies and rejects unwanted frequencies enabling band selection andallowing a mobile phone to process only the intended signal.

It has been estimated that by 2020, a shift to Carrier aggregation, 5Gand 4×4 MIMO could result in mobile phones requiring upwards of 100filters and a global market of 200 billion filters a year.

Acoustic resonators are basic building blocks of RF filters and sensors.These typically include a piezoelectric electromechanical transductionlayer which converts mechanical energy into electrical energy. Theseresonators have to be cheap but reliable. The two most common types ofacoustic resonators are Surface Acoustic Wave Resonators (SAW) and BulkAcoustic Wave Resonators (BAW).

In Surface Acoustic Wave resonators the acoustic signal is carried by asurface wave. In Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonators (BAW) the signal iscarried through the bulk of the resonator film. The resonant frequencyof both types of filter is a characteristic of its dimensions and of themechanical properties of the materials used in its construction.

The quality of a resonator is given by its Q factor. This is the ratioof the energy stored to the power dissipated. A high Q factor indicatesthat the filter loses little energy during operation. This translates toa lower insertion loss and a steeper skirt for “sharper” differentiationto nearby bands.

The next generation of mobile phones will be required to operate athigher frequencies to enable transmitting and receiving the ever growingdata traffic. Moving to such higher frequencies without enlarging themobile phone requires small low power resonators that operate at higherfrequencies and that can be used in smart phones without rapid depletionof the battery power pack.

The quality factor or Q factor is a dimensionless parameter thatdescribes how under-damped an oscillator or resonator is, andcharacterizes a resonator's bandwidth relative to its center frequency.The next generation of mobile phones requires quality resonators havinghigh Q factors.

Bulk-acoustic-wave (BAW) filters provide better performance than surfaceacoustic wave filters. Whereas the best SAW filters may have Q factorsof 1000 to 1500, current state of the art BAW resonators have Q factorsof 2500 to 5000.

BAW filters can operate at higher frequencies than SAW filters. Theyhave better power handling, smaller sizes, higher electrostaticdischarges (ESD), better bulk radiation and less out of band ripple.

However, SAW filters are simpler and cheaper to manufacture and sincethe IDT pitch can be varied by the mask layout, resonators havingsignificantly different frequencies can be made on the same die, usingthe same piezoelectric film thickness.

The electrical impedance of a BAW resonator has two characteristicfrequencies: the resonance frequency f_(R) and anti-resonance frequencyf_(A). At f_(R), the electrical impedance is very small whereas atf_(A), the electrical impedance is very large. Filters are made bycombining several resonators. The shunt resonator is shifted infrequency with respect to the series resonator. When the resonancefrequency of the series resonator equals the anti-resonance frequency ofthe shunt resonator, the maximum signal is transmitted from the input tothe output of the device. At the anti-resonance frequency of the seriesresonator, the impedance between the input and output terminals is highand the filter transmission is blocked. At the resonance frequency ofthe shunt resonator, any current flowing into the filter section isshorted to ground by the low impedance of the shunt resonator so thatthe BAW filter also blocks signal transmission at this frequency. Thefrequency spacing between f_(R) and f_(A) determines the filterbandwidth.

For frequencies other than the resonance and anti-resonance frequencies,the BAW resonator behaves like a Metal-Insulator-Metal (MIM) capacitor.Consequently, far below and far above these resonances, the magnitude ofthe electrical impedance is proportional to 1/f where f is thefrequency. The frequency separation between f_(R) and f_(A) is a measureof the strength of the piezoelectric effect in the resonator that isknown as the effective coupling coefficient—represented by K² _(eff).Another way to describe the effective coupling coefficient is as ameasure of the efficiency of the conversion between electrical andmechanical energy by the resonator (or filter). It will be noted thatthe electromechanical coupling coefficient is a materials relatedproperty that defines the K² _(eff) for the piezoelectric film.

The level of performance of a filter is given by its factor of merit(FOM) which is defined as FOM=Q*K² _(eff).

For practical applications, both a sufficiently high K² _(eff) and highQ factor values are desired. However, there is a trade-off between theseparameters. Although K² _(eff) is not a function of frequency, theQ-value is frequency dependent and therefore the FOM (Factor of Merit)is also a function of frequency. Hence the FOM is more commonly used infilter design than in the resonator design.

Depending on the application, often device designers can tolerate alowering in the K² _(eff) to achieve a high Q factor where a smallsacrifice in K² _(eff) gives a large boost in the Q value. However, theopposite approach of sacrificing Q-value to obtain a design having anadequate K² _(eff) is not feasible.

K² _(eff) can be enhanced by choosing a high acoustic impedanceelectrode, and can also be traded off with other parameters such aselectrode thickness and a thicker passivation layer.

There are two main types of BAW resonators (and thus filters): SMR(Solidly Mounted Resonators) and FBAR (Film Bulk Acoustic Resonatorresonators.

In the SMR resonator, a Bragg reflector is created under the bottomelectrode using a stack of alternating low and high impedance thin filmlayers, each having a thickness λ/4, where λ is the wavelength of thetarget frequency. The Bragg reflector stack acts an acoustic mirror toreflect the acoustic wave back into the resonator.

SMR resonators are easier (and thus typically cheaper) to manufacturethan FBAR resonators and since the piezoelectric film is attacheddirectly to the substrate, heat is dissipated more effectively. However,in SMR based filters, only the longitudinal acoustic wave is reflectedbut not the shear waves. Consequently SMR filters have lower Q factorsthan FBAR based filters.

In the FBAR resonator a free-standing bulk acoustic membrane which issupported only around its edge is used. An air cavity is providedbetween the bottom electrode and the carrier wafer. The high Q factor ofthe FBAR is a great advantage over the SMR.

The Commercial FBAR filter market is dominated by Broadcom™ (previouslyAVAGO™) which uses Aluminum Nitride (AlN) as the piezoelectric thin-filmmaterial that best balances performance, manufacturability and WaferLevel Packaging (WLP) processing that employs Si cavity micro-cappingover the FBAR device with TSV (through silicon via) for flip chipelectrical contacts. AlN has the highest acoustic velocity for apiezoelectric film (11,300 m/s) and hence requires a thicker film for agiven resonance frequency which eases process tolerances. Furthermore,high quality sputtered AlN films with FWHM (Full width at half maximumXRD peak) of less than 1.8 degrees allow K² _(eff) values that are above6.4% which is conveniently about twice the transmit band for FCCmandated PCS. With Q values reaching 5000, FOM values of 250 to 300 areachievable, representing best in class filter devices. K² _(eff) must bekept constant to meet the band requirement. Consequently, to improve theFOM of a filter generally requires increasing the Q value.

Despite the high performance of the above mentioned FBAR filters, issuesstill remain that prevent moving forward to the next generation ofwireless communication. The greater number of users sending andreceiving more data results in increasingly jammed bands. To overcomethis, future bandwidths should be more flexible to adapt to agilearrangements of different bands. For example, The 5 GHz WiFi band has 3sub-bands located at 5.150-5.350 GHz, 5.475-5.725 GHz, 5.725-5.825 GHz,respectively, corresponding to required K² _(eff) of around 7.6%, 8.8%and 3.4%. The coupling coefficient K² _(eff) is mainly decided by theintrinsic nature of the piezoelectric material, but is affected by thecrystalline quality and orientation of the piezo film, by exteriorcapacitors and inductors and by the thickness of the electrodes andother stacked materials. The bandwidth of AlN FBARs is mainly modulatedby inductors and capacitors that are pre-integrated into the ICsubstrate carriers. However, these elements degrade the Q factor andalso increase the substrate layer count and thus increase the size ofthe final product. Another approach for K² _(eff) modulation is to usean electrostrictive material to realize tunable band FBAR filters. Onecandidate material is Ba_(x)Sr_(1-x)TiO₃ (BST) that may be tuned oncethe DC electrical field is applied.

Tunability with BST can also be achieved by using the material as avariable capacitor build in part with the FBAR resonators circuitrythereby assisting in matching filters and in adjusting their rejection.Furthermore, since a BST FBAR resonates only with a certain applied DCbias voltage, it may represent low leakage switching properties,potentially eliminating switches from the Front End Module (FEM) of themobile device and thereby simplifying module architecture and reducingboth size and cost. BST FBARs also possess other favorable propertiesfor RF applications. The high permittivity of ferroelectric materials(εr>100) allows for reduction in the size of devices; for example, atypical BST resonator area and BST filter area is in the order of 0.001mm² and 0.01 mm², respectively, at low GHz frequencies in standard50-ΩRF systems. In fact, using BST the resonator size may be an order ofmagnitude smaller than that of conventional AlN resonators. Moreover,the power consumption in the BST FBAR itself is negligible—even with theusage of the above-mentioned DC bias voltage across the device due to avery small leakage current in the BST thin-film.

Strong c-axis texture is the most important prerequisite for AlN or BSTbased FBARs because the acoustic mode for such FBARs needs to belongitudinally activated, and the piezoelectric axis of both AlN and BSTis along the c-axis. Hence high quality single crystal piezo film, asrepresented by FWHM of less than 1°, have great impact on the FBARfilter properties and can reduce the RF power that is otherwise wastedas heat by as much as 50%. This power saving can significantly reducethe rate of drop calls and increase the battery life of mobile phones.

Epitaxial piezoelectric films with single orientation may have othermerits. For example, strongly textured epitaxially grown single crystalpiezo films are expected to have smoother surfaces than those ofrandomly oriented films. This in turn, results in reduced scatteringloss and a smoother interface between the metal electrodes to the piezofilms which both contribute to a higher Q-factor.

Furthermore, there is an inverse thickness to operating frequencyrelationship for AlN and BST filter films. Ultra thin-films are neededfor extremely high frequency filters such as 5 GHz WiFi, Ku and K bandfilters. For filter operating at 6.5 GHz the thickness of BST filmshould be around 270 nm and for 10 GHz the thickness of an MN filmshould be around 200 μm. These dimensions invokes serious challenges forfilm growth because it is hard to attain the necessary stiffness for anextremely thin anchored membrane and the crystalline defects and strainsare more likely to cause cracks and mechanical failures as the membranefilm becomes thinner. As such, more innovative membrane supportingstructures with defect-free single crystal films are needed for the nextgeneration of high frequency FBARs.

Unfortunately, AlN, BST and other piezoelectric materials have vastlattice spacing and orientation differences to those of currently usedbottom electrode metals. Furthermore, the range of bottom electrodematerials available, especially in the case of BST, is very limitedsince they have to withstand relatively high temperatures during thesubsequent deposition of the piezo film thereupon. As a result, to date,no true high quality single crystal piezo FBAR films have beensuccessfully demonstrated.

SUMMARY

An aspect of the technology is directed to a filter package comprisingan array of piezoelectric films sandwiched between an array of upperelectrodes and lower electrodes: the individual piezoelectric films andthe upper electrodes being separated by a passivation material; thelower electrode being coupled to an interposer with a first cavitybetween the lower electrodes and the interposer; the filter packagefurther comprises a silicon wafer of known thickness attached over theupper electrodes with an array of upper cavities between the siliconwafer and a silicon cover; each upper cavity is aligned with apiezoelectric film in the array of piezoelectric films, the uppercavities having side walls comprising the passivation material.

Preferably the piezoelectric films comprise Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ (BST).

Preferably the piezoelectric films each comprise a single crystal.

Optionally, the lower electrodes comprise aluminum.

Preferably edges of the lower electrodes are stiffened by an under bumpmetallization material comprising of a titanium adhesion layer followedby tungsten or tantalum.

The lower electrode may br coupled to the interposer by solder tippedcopper pillars.

Typically an under bump metallization material comprising tungsten ortantalum connects the lower electrode to the copper pillars.

Preferably the upper electrodes comprise aluminum.

Preferably the passivation material comprises either polyimide orBenzocyclobutene (BCB).

Typically a first adhesion layer of titanium is disposed between thepiezoelectric membrane and the lower electrode.

Optionally the first adhesion layer comprises titanium.

Optionally the silicon wafer is attached to the upper electrode by anadhesion layer adjacent to the upper electrode, a bonding layer and afurther adhesion layer attached to the silicon wafer, thereby creating acomposite electrode.

Typically, the adhesion layer and further adhesion layer comprisetitanium.

Typically the bonding layer is selected from the group comprising Au—Inalloy, Au and AlN.

Typically the silicon wafer has a thickness in the range of 1 micron to10 microns and is coupled to the silicon cover by the passivationmaterial and/or silicon oxide.

Optionally the silicon cover is 90 microns thick.

Typically the filter package is encapsulated in polymer overfill,wherein a barrier between the filter array and the interposer provides aperimeter wall of the lower cavity, wherein said barrier comprises atleast one of an SU8 gasket around the filter array that is attached tothe lower electrode and an epoxy dam attached to the interposer.

Optionally the interposer comprises at least one via layer and onerouting layer of copper encapsulated a dielectric matrix.

In some embodiments, the interposer comprises a polymer matrix selectedfrom the group consisting of polyimide, epoxy, BT(Bismaleimide/Triazine), Polyphenylene Ether (PPE), Polyphenylene Oxide(PPO) and their blends.

Typically, the interposer further comprises glass fibers and/or ceramicfillers.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

For a better understanding of the invention and to show how it may becarried into effect, reference will now be made, purely by way ofexample, to the accompanying drawings.

With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressedthat the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes ofillustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the presentinvention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what isbelieved to be the most useful and readily understood description of theprinciples and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, noattempt is made to show structural details of the invention in moredetail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of theinvention; the description taken with the drawings making apparent tothose skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may beembodied in practice. In particular, it will be appreciated that theschematic illustrations are not to scale, and the thickness of some verythin layers is exaggerated. In the accompanying drawings:

FIG. 1 is a schematic not-to-scale cross section representation of aComposite FBAR filter module which combines a plurality of CompositeFBAR resonators coupled in half ladder or lattice arrangements orcombinations thereof.

FIG. 2 is a simplified circuit of a ladder type RF filter configuration;

FIG. 3 is a graph showing the transmission response of the ladder filterconfiguration of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a simplified circuit of a lattice type RF filterconfiguration;

FIG. 5 is a graph showing the transmission response of the lattice typefilter configuration of FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a simplified circuit of a combined ladder and lattice type RFfilter configuration;

FIG. 7 is a graph showing the transmission response of the filterconfiguration of FIG. 7;

FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a method of fabricating the CompositeFBAR structure of FIG. 1;

FIGS. 9 to 52 are schematic representations of the build up achieved bythe corresponding steps in the flowchart of FIG. 3.

FIG. 53 is an XRD spectrum of a piezoelectric film of aBa_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ (BST) film on a carrier substrate showing thatsingle crystal Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ (BST) was obtained.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

By way of example, a design for a Composite FBAR filter module withsingle crystal Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ resonators is detailed hereunderwith reference to FIG. 1, together with methods of manufacture withreference to FIG. 3.

With reference to FIG. 1 a Composite FBAR filter module 5 isschematically shown. The filter module 5 comprises a plurality ofcomposite FBAR resonators coupled in half ladder or lattice arrangementsor in combinations thereof. The composite FBAR resonators consist ofpiezoelectric films 18′, 18″ that are preferably single crystalBa_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ separated by a passivation material 54 such as apolyimide or BCB (Benzocyclobutene) and sandwiched between electrodes22, 60.

In the method of construction described hereinbelow, it will be notedthat both top and bottom electrodes 22, 60 are deposited onto thepiezoelectric material 18 rather than by depositing a piezoelectricmaterial on top of an electrode which is currently standard practice forFBAR filter construction. This enables a wider range of metals such asaluminum to be used as the electrodes. Aluminum has higher conductivityand is less dense, this enables decreasing the electrode weight and thesubsequent mechanical damping it causes to the resonator. The electroderesonator material is coupled to a silicon film 30 which providesmechanical strength and low acoustic loss. The silicon film 30 isattached by a layer of silicon oxide 34 to a cover 32 that is a thickersilicon wafer and is known as a ‘handle’, providing a ‘wafer on handle’using SOI technology. Cavities 76 are provided within the silicon oxidelayer 34 opposite the piezoelectric resonator films 18. The bondingbetween the electrode 22 and the silicon film 30 may be achieved in anumber of ways, such as by a gold-indium eutectic 48, Ni/Sn, a goldlayer 50 or an MN layer 52. Thin layers of one of these bondingmaterials may be attached to both the electrode 22 and to the siliconfilm 30 by adhesion layers 46, 46′ such as titanium and then the thinlayers of the bonding material are fused together.

The coated piezoelectric resonator array is attached to an interposer 85by interconnects comprising solder 68 capped copper pillars 66, and isencapsulated in a polymer underfill/over-mold 72. A gasket 70 isprovided around the filter, between the interposer 85 and the lowerelectrode 60 around the resonator array that defines the filter. Thegasket 70 may consist of SU-8 attached to the lower electrode 60 and anepoxy dam 86 may be built up from the interposer 85. The gasket 70 andepoxy dam 86 work together to prevent the underfill/over-mold 72 thatseals the unit from penetrating under the resonator array and define acavity 92 between the lower electrode 60 and the interposer 85.Additional cavities 76 are provided over the piezoelectric films 18′,18″ in the space between the silicon membrane 30 and cover 32, byselective removal of the silicon dioxide 34 by etching, with a grid ofpassivation material 54 that is typically polyimide or BCB(Benzocyclobutene) acting as an etch stop and defining the side walls ofthe cavity 76. The passivation material 54 also separates the upperelectrode 22, adhesion layers 20, 46, 46′ and bonding layers 48/50/52into separate regions supporting pairs of parallel resonators andseparating resonators that are connected in series.

An Under Bump Metallization (UBM) Layer 62 that comprises tungsten ortantalum (possibly with an adhesion layer of titanium), enablesfabrication of the copper pillars 66 on the underside of the bottomelectrode 60. Other remnants of the UBM 63 serve as stiffening weightsaround the perimeter of the lower electrode 60, which, being aluminum,has a very low weight. Thus the electrodes 22, 60 may be aluminum whichhas high conductivity and low mass, and thus hardly damps the resonatormembranes 18′, 18″, but both mass and thickness giving stiffening may beprovided around the edge of the electrodes where needed.

The Commercial FBAR filter market is dominated by Broadcom™ which usesAluminum Nitride (AlN) as the piezoelectric thin-film material that bestbalances performance and manufacturability. However, preferredembodiments of the technology disclosed herein below useBa_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ (BST) since it enables filters that are an order ofmagnitude smaller since the dielectric constant thereof is one to twoorders of magnitude higher than that of MN.

Because single crystal Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ may be used for theresonator membranes 18, very high quality filters may be fabricated. Atthe time of writing, best in class prior art FABRs have Factors of Merit(FOM) of 250-300. Since single crystal Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ can have a Qfactor of 4000 one can achieve a FOM of 248 from this material with only6.2% coupling. With a coupling of 8.5% one can achieve a FOM of 340.

It is stressed that to the best of our knowledge, single crystalmembranes have never been used in resonators and single crystalmembranes of Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ have never before been fabricated.

With reference to FIG. 2, a simplified circuit of a half ladder typefilter configuration created by BAW resonators in series with shunt BAWresonators is shown. In a filter, resonators are combined in a ‘ladder’,wherein each ‘rung’ or ‘stage’ comprises two resonators: one in seriesand the other connected in shunt. With reference to FIG. 3, adding rungsto the ladder, improves the rejection of undesired frequencies, creatinga signal with less out-of-band rejection (a steeper skirt) but this isat the expense of insertion loss and greater power consumption. Withreference to FIG. 4, another resonator configuration may be a “lattice”,which, as shown in FIG. 5 has poorer cutoff but better out-of-bandattenuation.

With reference to FIG. 6, the ladder and lattice type circuits may becombined to provide the transmission response shown in FIG. 7. Thepossible arrangements of resonators to create filters is beyond thescope of this application, but methods for fabricating resonators thatare coupled in series and parallel are discussed hereunder withreference to FIGS. 41 and 42 and this enables arranging the resonatorsin the various ladder, lattice and combination arrangements.

Referring back to FIG. 1, in preferred embodiments, the resonator film18 is a single crystal piezoelectric, preferably a <111> orientationsingle crystal of Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃. Since there are no grainboundaries in a single crystal and further the acoustic mode for suchFBARs is longitudinally activated along the <111> plane, the attenuationof the acoustic signal is minimal. This also minimizes the lost energythat is otherwise transferred into heat and which has to be dissipated.

Single crystal and strongly textured BST films have smoother surfacesthan randomly oriented films. This results in reduced scattering lossand higher Q-factors. Furthermore, rough surfaces, especially at highfrequencies, are a major cause of the loss of the metal electrodesinterfaces because of a skin effect. The smooth electrode—piezolelectricinterfaces obtainable in highly textured and single crystal films withboth upper and lower electrodes deposited thereupon are thus extremelyadvantageous.

To the best of our knowledge, single crystal Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃resonator films and Composite FBAR filters have not been achieved in thepast, and the technology described herein is directed to such films andto methods for their manufacture.

Composite FBAR structures consist of a thin piezoelectric film 18sandwiched between top and bottom electrodes 22, 60. In the past, theelectrode 22 was first deposited and then the piezoelectric layer 18 wasfabricated thereupon. This required the electrode 22 to be made from aheavy metal such as platinum, molybdenum, tungsten or gold, that allowsthe high deposition temperatures required for subsequent piezoelectricfilm deposition thereupon. However, it has been found that suchrefractory metal have a crystal mismatch with BST and do not enableachieving single crystal Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ in a <111> orientationthereupon. Furthermore, most of these metals have poor DC resistance,potentially deteriorating the Q factor of the resonator. In preferredembodiments described herein the electrodes 22, 60 are deposited ontothe piezoelectric film 18 using physical vapor techniques. This enableslightweight metals such as aluminum to be used, either on its own or inconjunction with other metal layers to form composite electrodes.Aluminum has a high conductivity and so a thinner electrode is possible.Aluminum is much less dense than refractory metals and so the weight ofthe electrodes and their damping effect is less. The quality andcoupling of the resonators and filters thus formed are vastly superiorto those of the prior art.

The mechanism used in ferroelectric BST Composite FBAR transducers iselectrostriction which is the electric field induced piezoelectriceffect. The top and bottom electrodes 22, 60 are used to apply directcurrent (DC) and radio frequency (RF) signals. The preferred BSTComposite FBAR Composite structure described herein consists of a thinfilm single crystal BST film 18 sandwiched between top and bottomaluminum electrodes 22, 60. The BST film 18 converts mechanical toelectrical energy and vice versa.

To provide stiffening without substantial weight, a low acoustic-losssilicon layer 30 is coupled to the piezoelectric films 18. The siliconlayer 30 may have a thickness in the range of 1 μm to 10 μm, with thelowest possible thickness being preferable for best performance highfrequency resonators. It should be noted that in Composite FBARs thereare odd and even resonance modes, where each mode exhibits peak Q andCoupling as a function of the BST to silicon thickness ratio. The peakK² _(eff) values decrease with mode number because the fraction ofacoustic displacement across the BST is reduced. However, the peak Qfactor values increase with mode number, since the fraction of acousticdisplacement across the low loss silicon layer increases. Hence, carefulselection of the resonance mode is required for optimal FOM and lowthickness silicon membranes with low thickness BST films are desired forhigher frequencies filters. Cavities 76, 92 are provided above and belowthe piezoelectric 18 on silicon 30 combination. The structure isencapsulated with a polymer 72 and mounted on an interposer 85 andcoupled thereto with copper pillars 66 that are typically about 40-50 μmwide and about 40 μm high and joined to upper contact pads 82 of theinterposer 85 with solder 68. A polymer gasket 70 which may befabricated from SU-8 to have a high form factor and/or a dam 86(typically epoxy) may be provided around the perimeter of the filterstructure to keep the polymer under-fill/overmold 72 from entering thelower cavity 92. The interposer 85 may be constructed using wellestablished fabrication technologies.

The Composite FBAR shown in FIG. 1 has such a piezoelectric 18 onsilicon 30 Composite FBAR structure, preferably wherein thepiezoelectric film 18 is a BST single crystal <111> and the electrodes22, 60 are fabricated from lightweight aluminum.

Although RF resonators are primarily used as filters, they find otheruses, including as sensors, for example. There is also interest intunable resonators that can operate at different frequencies.

As shown in FIG. 8 and with further reference to FIGS. 9 to 52, the mainprocess flow for fabricating this consists of obtaining and providing aremovable wafer carrier with a release layer—step (a), a schematic, notto scale representation is shown in FIG. 9. With reference to FIG. 9, aC-axis <0001>±1° Sapphire wafer 10 with an un-doped Gallium Nitride(U-GaN) release layer C-axis <0001>±1° 12 is obtained. Such sapphirewafers 10 with U-GaN 12 deposited thereon are commercially available.Such sapphire wafer layers 10 are available with diameters of 2″, 4″ and6″ in thicknesses of from 430 μm, and have a polished surface with anRMS smoothness of less than 1 nm. The U-GaN layer 12 has a typicalthickness of 4 μm and a polished surface having an RMS of less than 1 nmready for epitaxial growth thereon. These coated substrates weredeveloped for the Light Emitting Diode (LED) industry and arecommercially available from various Chinese manufacturers includingSan'an Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. (San'an) and Suzhou Nanowin Science andTechnology Co., Ltd (NANOWIN)™.

A piezoelectric film is now deposited onto the removable carrier 10—step(b). With reference to FIG. 10, to aid heat dissipation and thusthickness distribution during subsequent deposition of a piezoelectricfilm, a metal layer 14 is deposited on the back of the sapphire wafer10—step (bi), i.e. the side opposite to the side coated with GaN 12. Thethickness of the metal layer 14 depends on the metal used. In thisinstance, and because of the nature of the buffer layer 16 andpiezoelectric material 18 subsequently deposited (see below) titanium isa good candidate for the heat dissipating metal layer 14, and anappropriate thickness for the heat dissipating layer 14 is about 150 nm.The heat dissipating metal layer 14 may be deposited by sputtering, forexample.

With reference to FIG. 11, a buffer layer 16 of <100> TiO₂ (rutile) orSrTiO₃ is then deposited onto the Gallium Nitride release layer C-axis<0001>±1° (U-GaN) 12 using Oxide Molecular Beam Epitaxy—step 3(bii).This may be achieved using commercially available equipment that isobtainable from vendors such as Varian™, Veeco™ and SVT Associates™, forexample. The Gallium Nitride release layer 12 is typically about 4 nmthick with an RMS roughness of less than 2 nm. Because of the latticematching between the <100> plane of the rutile TiO₂ 16 and the <0001>plane of the GaN 12 and Sapphire 10, the TiO₂ 16 is laid down as asingle crystal film. Instead of TiO₂ buffer layer 16, or between theTiO₂ and the Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ (BST) 18 film, a <111> buffer layer ofSrTiO₃ may be deposited. Referring now to FIG. 12 a layer ofBa_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ (BST) 18 having a thickness of between 10 nm and 50nm and typically 20-40 nm is then deposited onto the rutile TiO₂, theSrTiO₃ or TiO₂/SrTiO₃ double layer buffer layer 16 by oxide molecularbeam epitaxy (MBE) using targets of Barium Oxide, Strontium Oxide andTitanium Oxide in low pressure excess oxygen—step (b)iii. The oxidemolecular beam epitaxy (MBE) is a high purity low energy depositiontechnique that allows for low point defect manufacturing. Because of theclose matching between the <111> Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ 18 lattice spacingand the <100> TiO₂ (rutile) 16 and/or <111> SrTiO₃ lattice spacing, andbetween the <100> TiO₂ (rutile) 16 and <111> SrTiO₃ lattice spacingwhere both coatings are used, the Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ 18 is depositedas a single crystal film, and may have a thickness in the range of 100nm to 500 nm within tolerances of ±1%.

With reference to FIG. 53 an XRD spectrum of the stack is shown. Thisdemonstrates that the Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ film is truly epitaxial <111>single crystal Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃. The full width half maximum (FWHM)of the XRD peak thus obtained may be less than 1°. Since grainboundaries inhibit the transmission of acoustic waves and inpoly-crystal piezoelectric films it is not easy to control the grainsize, unlike poly-crystal piezoelectric which attenuates the signal, itwill be appreciated that using a single crystal film provides Q valuesabove 3000 and BST coupling values above 6.6% and thus enablesresonators having factors of merit (FOM) of 198, which is much betterthan anything previously achieved, despite the fact that the BST film issupported. Furthermore, very thin BST films are obtainable and thisenables fabricating filters for very high frequency use.

It is possible to control the Barium to Strontium ratio with highaccuracy of ±1% and this affects the Q factor and coupling of the film.

The epitaxially grown BST films may have a RMS roughness of less than1.5 nm. This minimizes the so called ripple effect.

Using BST, preferably single crystal BST as the piezoelectric materialin Composite FBARs provides several favorable properties for RFapplications. The high permittivity of the material (εr>100) allows forreducing the size of devices. For example, in a standard 50-Ω RF systemat low GHz frequencies, a typical BST resonator area is in the order of0.001 mm² and a typical BST filter area is about 0.01 mm². Thus theresonator size is smaller by an order of magnitude than conventional AlNresonators. As mobile communication equipment such as smart-phonesbecome ever more complicated, they require ever more filters, and thissmall filter size is thus very important. Furthermore, the powerconsumption of BST resonators and filters is negligible, even with a dcbias voltage across the device as necessary to operate it, due to thevery small leakage current of thin film ferroelectric BST.

In prior art resonators, the lower electrode is first deposited and thenthe piezoelectric film is deposited thereon. Consequently, due to thehigh temperature fabrication of the piezoelectric film, refractorymetals such as molybdenum, tungsten, platinum or gold are traditionallyused for the lower electrode. It will be appreciated that theserefractory metals have crystal mismatch for achieving single crystalBa_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ in a <111> orientation. Furthermore, most of thesemetals have poor DC resistance, potentially lowering the Q factor of thefilter.

Since in the present technology, the first electrode 22 is depositedonto the piezoelectric film, a wide range of metals may be used such asaluminum and/or titanium.

A first electrode layer 22 is now deposited over the piezoelectricmembrane 10—step (c). With reference to FIG. 13, to aid adhesion, anadhesion layer 20 such as a titanium layer that may be as little as 5 nmthick, but could be as much as 50 nm is first deposited onto theBa_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ 18—step (ci). Then, with reference to FIG. 14, analuminum electrode 22 of, say 100 nm to 150 nm is depositedthereover—step 3(cii). Both the adhesion layer 20 and the electrode 22may be deposited by sputtering, for example. Tolerances of ±5% areacceptable and easily obtainable.

At a first approximation, the resonant frequency f_(R) of apiezoelectric resonator is given by the following equation:f_(R)=ν/λ≈νL/2t

where νL is the longitudinal acoustic velocity in the normal directionof the piezoelectric layer, t is the thickness of the piezoelectric filmand λ is the acoustic wavelength of the longitudinal wave.

However, in practice, the acoustic properties of the other layers of theresonator affect the resonator performance. In particular, the massloading effect of the electrodes which tend to be made of heavy metalssuch as molybdenum and platinum, due to the need to withstand thefabrication temperature of the piezoelectric material.

Although described for depositing aluminum onto Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃, itwill be appreciated that PVD or CVD with otherwise, low density, highconductivity electrode materials 22 over different piezoelectric layersmay be used with the same method. For example, carbon nano-tubes (CNT)over single crystal AlN or ZnO piezo films may be considered. Aluminumis particularly attractive for resonator electrodes since it has highelectrical and thermal conductivity and a low density, so hardly lowersthe overall Q factor of the resonator. However, previous manufacturingroutes, wherein the electrode was deposited prior to deposition of thepiezoelectric, ruled out aluminum.

The piezoelectric film 18, adhesion layer 20 and aluminum electrode 22are deposited over the entire sapphire wafer 10 as a continuous layer.

With reference to FIG. 15, a backing film on handle 28 is obtained—Step(d). This is a commercially available silicon on insulator (SOI)product. The backing film on handle 28 is typically a silicon wafer film30 sandwiched to a silicon carrier 32 by a silicon oxide layer 34.

A commercially available backing film on handle 28 obtainable from KSTWorld Corp™ (www.kstworld.co.jp) that is suitable is shown schematicallyin FIG. 3(d) and consists of a silicon film 30 that comes in thicknessesin the typical range 1.5 to 10 μm that is coupled by a SiO2 box 34 thatis typically 10-20 μm thick to a Silicon handle 32 that is typicallyabout 400 μm thick.

An alternative SOI product 36 shown in FIG. 16 is a silicon wafer 38attached to a silicon carrier 42 by a silicon oxide layer 40, but with apreformed air cavity 44. Such a structure is commercially available fromIcemos™ (www.icemostech.com).

Both SOI products 28, 36 may be obtained pre-coated with metal coatingson the silicon film 30, 38 aiding their attachment to the piezoelectricfilm-electrode sandwich.

With reference to FIG. 17, the commercially available film 30 (38) onhandle 32 (42) product 28 (36) is attached to the oxide layer 28deposited over the electrode 22 of the stack—step (e).

There are a number of ways that the silicon film 30 (38) may be attachedto the oxide layer 28. For example, with reference to FIG. 18 anadhesion layer such as titanium 46 may be deposited onto the electrodelayer 22 and this can be coated with an adhesive layer consisting of agold-indium eutectic alloy 48 comprising 0.6% gold and 99.4% indium. TheAu—In eutectic melts at 156° C. and by hot pressing at about 200° C.,the adhesion layer may be attached to the silicon membrane 30 of the SOIwafer 28. Optionally, a titanium bonding layer 46′ is attached to thesilicon membrane 30 and an adhesive layer of gold-indium eutectic alloy48 is attached to this. The two adhesion layers are fused together bythe hot processing.

The process is capable of some variation. With reference to FIG. 19, analternative process relies on the fact that both the exposed surface ofthe silicon wafer film 30 (38) and the surface of the electrode layer 22are very smooth. By coating both surfaces with adhesion layers oftitanium 46, 46′ that are typically 2-4 nm thick and may be deposited bysputtering, and then depositing pure gold 50 (50′) coatings ofthicknesses of 10-40 nm onto the adhesion layers 46 (46′) the two goldcoatings 50, 50′ may be brought together at room temperature and thecoatings fused together (see for example Shimatsu, T. & Uomoto, M.(2010). “Atomic diffusion bonding of wafers with thin nanocrystallinemetal films”. Journal of Vacuum Science Technology B: Microelectronicsand Nanometer Structures. 28 (4). pp. 706-714.). This technique requiresa lower temperature and a thinner gold layer 50 than the Au—In eutecticused in variant step 3e′.

A further alternative process, shown in FIG. 20 is to again coat bothsurfaces with adhesion layers of titanium 46, 46′ that are typically 2-4nm thick, and then deposit aluminum nitride 52 (52′) coatings havingthicknesses of 10-40 nm onto the adhesion layers 46 (46′). The twoaluminum nitride 52 (52′) coatings may be activated with Ar plasma andwhen brought into contact at room temperature and pressure, fusetogether. The bond can be strengthened by annealing at 300° C. in a N₂atmosphere, typically for a period of 3 hr. It will be noted that AlN isitself a piezoelectric material.

It will be appreciated that the stack of titanium adhesion layers 20,46, 46′ and the gold-indium or gold bonding layers 48, 50 serve with thealuminum electrode 22 layer as the upper electrode. This compositeelectrode can take advantage of the inherent characteristics such as DCresistance, acoustic impedance and weight (density) of the differentmaterials, to provide different properties to the composite electrode.

In general, it is advisable to process at as low a temperature aspossible to minimize the likelihood of damage to the piezoelectric filmand its electrodes and to further minimize warpage of the stack due todifferences in the coefficient of thermal expansion of silicon andsapphire. It is further advised that the bonding layer thickness shouldbe as thin as possible in order to enhance the Q factor value but thathigher bonding layer thicknesses are also possible thorough carefulbalancing of the DC resistance, weight and acoustic impedances of thecomposite electrode.

Once the silicon film and handle 28 is attached, the sapphire substrate10 may be removed step (f). If a thermal layer such as titanium 14 isdeposited on the back of the substrate, this may be removed by chemicalmechanical polishing, for example—step (fi) giving the structure shownschematically in FIG. 21. Then, the GaN 12 may be irradiated through thesapphire substrate 10 using a 248 nm excimer laser to disassociate theGaN 12 enabling lift off of the aluminum substrate 10 (step (fii). Sucha pulsed laser, with a square waveform is available from IPG Photonics™.This process is known as laser lift off and results in the structureshown schematically in FIG. 22.

Residual GaN 10 may be removed using Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP)with Cl₂, BCl₃ and Ar for example—Step (fiii), FIG. 23. This can beachieved at temperatures of below 150° C., avoiding heat treatment ofthe piezoelectric thin film 18 and of the aluminum 22 and other layers.The Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) is a commercially availableprocess, used by NMC (North Microelectrics) China Tool and by SAMCOINC™, for example.

Since the U-GaN deposited coating 12 may be more Gallium rich near tothe interface with the piezoelectric 18, a buffer layer 16 may berequired to protect the piezoelectric. This is a further purpose of theTiO₂ rutile layer which may now be removed—step f(iv), shown in FIG. 24,for example by exposing to an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) usingN₂:CF₄:Ar in a 6:16:4 sccm gas mixture.

After removing the TiO₂ buffer layer 16, a thickness measurement andtrimming process of the piezoelectric film 18 may be required to obtainperfect frequency response which is related to the film thickness—step(g). The trimming process uses Ar+ Ion beam milling and this process maybe used to tailor any metal adhesion, barrier or oxide layers such asSiO₂, Al₂O₃, AlN, W, Mo, Ta, Al, Cu, Ru, Ni or Fe where the wafers isheld in a 4 axis chuck and rotated accordingly. A commercially availablesystem known as InoScan™ is available from Meyer Burger™, Germany. Theresultant structure (rotated) is shown schematically in FIG. 25.

The same ICP process that is used to clean the back side of thepiezoelectric 18 may then be used to pattern the piezoelectric layer 18into arrays of piezoelectric islands for fabricating filters and thelike—step (h). By way of example only, a schematic top view is shown inFIG. 26 and a side view in FIG. 27. Although rectangular islands ofpiezoelectric are shown, the islands may, of course, have any shape asdictated by the shape of the lithography mask tool.

An induction coupled plasma (ICP) using Cl₂+BCl₃+Ar is then applied torespectively remove the aluminum, adhesion layers, bonding layer,silicon wafer, silicon oxide and down about 10 microns into the siliconhandle creating trenches 21—step (i) with end point detection being usedto stop the process. This process operates at a temperature of less than150° C. and does not adversely affect the piezoelectric membranes 18′,18″ which are protected by the photo-resist mask. Inductively CoupledPlasma (ICP) is a commercially available process, used by NMC (BeijingNorth Microelectronics) China Tool and by SAMCO INC™, for example.

A schematic top view of the resulting structure is shown in FIG. 28 anda schematic side view is shown in FIG. 29.

With reference to FIG. 30—schematic top view, and FIG. 31—schematic sideview, a passivation layer such as a photo-sensitive Polyimide or BCB(Benzocyclobutene) is applied in the trenches 21 thus produced step (j).The same passivation material 54 may be used to cover the piezoelectricislands 18′, 18″ with windows then being opened down through thepassivation layer to the piezoelectric islands by selective exposure.This is a precision process that includes the known series ofsub-processes such as spin-coat, exposure, development and cure ofphoto-sensitive polymer passivation layers. Photo-sensitive polyimidepassivation materials are available from HD Microsystems™ and are astandard industry solution for Flip Chip and Wafer Level Chip ScalePackages (WL-CSP) devices such as that described in this specification.Photo-sensitive BCB is commercially available as Cyclotene™ from DowChemicals™.

The upper electrodes are now applied—step (k). An adhesion layer 58 suchas titanium is first deposited—step (ki)—FIG. 32, and then the topelectrode 60 is then deposited—step (kii)—FIG. 33. Both the adhesionlayer 58 and the electrode 60 may be deposited by sputtering, forexample. Tolerances of ±5% are acceptable and easily obtainable.

Couplings are now applied to connect the structure to an interposer,described below. Firstly, an Under Bump Metallization (UBM) layer 62 maynow be applied—step (1) by depositing a layer of metal that may betitanium (typically about 500 Angstroms), Ti/W (typically about 500Angstroms titanium, followed by about 750 Angstroms of tungsten), orTi/Ta (typically about 500 Angstroms titanium, followed by about 1000Angstroms of tantalum—step (1)i, FIG. 34. Sputtering or PVD may be used.

The structure may then be covered with a layer of copper 64 that istypically about 1 μm thick, by sputtering, for example—step (1)ii—seeFIG. 35; the Under Bump Metallization layer 62 keeps the copper 64 andaluminum 60 separate.

Next, copper pillars 66 may be fabricated—step 1(iii), FIG. 36. Theseare typically about 40-50 μm in diameter and about 40 μm high. They maybe fabricated by depositing a layer of photoresist 65, patterning andthen electroplating copper 66 into the pattern.

Solder 68 may then be deposited into the pattern to cap the copperpillars 66—step 1(iv) (FIG. 37). This could be achieved byelectroplating or electro-less plating a suitable material into thephotoresist pattern used for fabricating the copper pillars 66. Then thephotoresist is stripped away—step (1)v, FIG. 38.

The copper layer 64 around the copper pillars 66 is now etched away—step1(vi), FIG. 39. This may be accomplished by exposing to a solution ofammonium hydroxide at an elevated temperature. Alternatively, copperchloride or other commercially available Cu micro-etch solution may beused as the etchant. The UBM 62 is now selectively removed—step (1)vii,FIG. 40, leaving perimeter sections 63 over what will become the edgesof the upper electrode to add weight to the edges of the effectiveresonators. Such “raised frame” structure is especially effective inComposite FBARs to help minimize lateral-wave spurious modes thatotherwise lower the Q factor of the device, regardless of the modenumber. With such structures, only the main lateral mode is excited dueto the new boundary conditions created by the raised frame between theactive and outside region of the resonator membrane 18. Thus, withreference to FIG. 41, by way of schematic illustration only, top andside views of a pair of piezoelectric capacitors coupled in parallel isshown, and with reference to FIG. 42, by way of schematic illustrationonly, top and side views of a pair of piezoelectric capacitors coupledin series is shown. The superfluous aluminum 60 beyond that required forthe electrode may be selectively removed by applying an inductivelycoupled plasma comprising Cl₂+BCl₃+Ar and the excess parts of thetitanium adhesion layer 58 thereby exposed may be selectively removed byreactive induction etching away with SF₆ and O₂.

With reference to FIG. 43, a polymer gasket 70 may now be fabricatedaround an array or resonators defining a filter—Step (n). This may beachieved using SU-8 technology. SU-8 is a commonly used epoxy-basednegative photoresist whereby the parts exposed to UV becomecross-linked, while the remainder of the film remains soluble and can bewashed away during development. SU8 can be deposited as a viscouspolymer that can be spun or spread over a thickness ranging from below 1μm to beyond 300 μm. It is an attractive material since it can bedeposited as a tall thin wall that can be about 55 μm high and thuscompatible with the solder capped copper pillars, whilst having a widthof from 10 to 30 μm.

At this stage, as shown in FIG. 44, the array of filters may be attachedto a tape 72 with the copper pillars 66 and SU8 gasket 70 side facingdownwards, and the silicon handle 32 may be thinned down to about 90microns—step (o), using chemical mechanical polishing (CMP), to producethe structure shown in FIG. 45. Other possible thinning techniquesinclude mechanical grinding, chemical polishing, wet etching togetherwith atmospheric downstream plasma (ADP) and dry chemical etching (DCE),for example,

Unless a SOI substrate 36 having prefabricated cavities 44—FIG. 16—wasused, cavities 76 are now formed in the SiO₂ 34 layer—step (p). Throughsilicon via etching (TSV) is used to drill holes 74 through the thinneddown silicon handle 32 to the SiO₂ box 34—step (p)i, FIG. 46 oppositeeach of the piezoelectric films 18′, 18″. The Silicon Oxide 34 may thenbe selectively etched away with HF vapor in accordance with the formulaSiO₂+4 HF(g)→SiF(g)+H₂O through the silicon via holes 74 to formcavities 76, with the passivation layer that bridges the gap between thesilicon wafer 30 and the silicon handle 32, through the silicon dioxidelayer 34 acting as an etch stop and defining the side walls of thecavities thus filled—step p(ii), FIG. 47. Dry vapor etching ispreferable to a wet etch since this enables penetration of smallfeatures and prevents the membrane and cover from sticking together.

Up until this stage, the filters are fabricated in arrays using on waferfabrication techniques. The array is now diced into separate filterunits—step (q).

Dicing may take place by mechanical blades, plasma or laser. Plasma orlaser may be preferred with some designs in order to avoid membranedamages. Such dicing tools are available by Disco™ Japan.

An interposer 85 is now procured step (r), FIG. 48. By way of enablementonly, a two layer interposer 80 may be fabricated by copperelectroplating of pads 80 and vias 82 into photoresist on a sacrificialcopper substrate, followed by laminating with a dielectric material 84having a polymer matrix such as polyimide, epoxy or BT(Bismaleimide/Triazine), Polyphenylene Ether (PPE), Polyphenylene Oxide(PPO) or their blends, either provided as a film, or as a pre-pregreinforced with glass fibers for additional stiffness. More details maybe found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,682,972 to Hurwitz et al. titled “Advancedmultilayer coreless structures and method for their fabrication”incorporated herein by reference. There are, however, alternativeestablished manufacturing routes for fabricating appropriateinterposers. An appropriate interposer 85 with copper pads 80 and vias82 in a dielectric with polymer matrix 84 is shown in FIG. 48.

If the technology of U.S. Pat. No. 7,682,972 to Hurwitz et al. is used,it may be preferable to attach the resonator to the interposer and thento encapsulate them prior to removing the sacrificial copper substrateby etching it away.

In general, the interposer 85 should be thin so that the overall packageremains thin. However, it will be appreciated that different resonators18′, 18″ may be interconnected via routing layers within the interposer85, and additional layers may be built up if r.

With reference to FIG. 49, usefully an epoxy dam structure 86 may firstbe deposited on the interposer surface —step (s). The epoxy damstructure 86 may be fabricated by silk-screening an epoxy polymer, or bylaminating a dry-film epoxy dam barrier that is photo-imageable. Thelast method is preferred as it provides high position accuracy withrespect to the SU8 gasket 70 on the filter die. It should be noted thatdry films may be deposited in several layers to achieve desiredthicknesses. As with the gasket 70 around each filter array, the dam 86could also be fabricated from SU-8. The dam 86 is designed to fit aroundthe gasket 70 and could be slightly larger or smaller in area than thearea surrounded by the gasket 70 to be positioned on the inside oroutside of the gasket 70. Indeed two dams 86 (one encircling and theencircled by the gasket) or a plurality of gaskets 70 could be provided.

As shown in FIG. 50, the interposer may then be attached to theComposite FBAR resonator array by aligning and melting the solder caps68 on the copper pillars 66—step (t).

The array device may be encapsulated in polymer 90—step (u); the dams 86and SU8 gaskets 70 working together preventing under fill of the cavity92 within the gasket 70 giving the structure of FIG. 51.

In this manner, the closely aligned SU8 connected to the Composite FBARarray and the epoxy dam connected to the substrate prevents under-fill72 from filling the cavity 92 under the piezo resonators 18′, 18″.

The array of resonators is then diced into separate filter modules—step(v), FIG. (52) for testing, packaging and shipment.

The interposer 85 may be a functional substrate with embedded inductors,lines and couplers. It should be noted the due to the small form factordimensions of the described BST FBAR filter as described above, theinterposer 85 may subsequently be placed on the same IC Substratetogether with controllers, power amplifiers and switches to generate afully integrated Front End Module (FEM). This allows all components tobe designed together to achieve optimum system performance.

Thus single crystal BST Composite FBARs are shown and described.

Due to its high Dielectric constant, when the bias voltage is zero, theSingle Crystal BST FBAR becomes a very low leakage capacitor so it canact as a switch.

Consequently the Single Crystal BST FBAR will only resonate at aspecific voltage. This potentially enables the elimination of switchesfrom the FEM which currently includes filters, power amplifiers,switches and controllers, thereby simplifying and lowering the cost ofthe FEM, it being appreciated that BST switches are known to operate atvery fast speeds, over trillions of cycles with very low leakagecurrents.

In resonator/filter designs with aluminum electrodes, the top electrodemay be split into two sections: the Al electrode itself and a separatedAl line that runs bias voltage to the BST and causes it to resonate.This bias voltage is usually between 5V to 40V, the voltage depending onthe resonator frequency. For example, Tests performed on 2700 Å Piezothick BST at 19V have caused the BST to resonate at 6.5 GHz.

Single crystal BST FBAR Filters are potentially tunable using capacitorsbuild around the filter on the same silicon carrier. It has beenestablished by numerous research groups that single crystal BST has atunability ratio of 1:8 or even 1:10 whereas amorphous orpolycrystalline BST has only has 1:3 to 1:4 tunability.

Single crystal BST FBAR resonators and thus filters have the followingadvantages:

-   -   Due to their dielectric constant single crystal BST FBAR        resonators (and thus filters) are smaller than AlN.    -   Such BST FBAR filters are “switchable” as they resonate only by        applying certain DC voltage.    -   Matching and adjusting rejection rates through tunable BST        capacitors build as part of the FBAR filter or as part of an        entire BST filter bank circuitry is possible since the process        to build a tunable BST capacitor and a BST FBAR resonator is        fundamentally the same.    -   Single crystal BST FBAR resonator can save up to 40% of the RF        power wasted as heat in prior art filters because the single        crystal orientation enables polarization of the excited acoustic        wave.    -   The single crystal BST FBARs disclosed herein can operate at        higher frequencies since the thickness of the ultra-thin BST        Piezo necessary for high frequencies is supported by an        additional membrane (composite FBAR).    -   Single crystal BST FBARs disclosed herein use processes and FABs        developed for LED manufacturing rather than dedicated and        expensive Si FABs. This reduces the investment and total cost to        manufacture the filter device. LED fabrication processes are        well understood and as such yields are higher than standard FBAR        processes.    -   Single crystal BST FBARs manufacturing processes disclosed        herein use the low cost back-end processes well established and        with high yields available by multiple wafer bumping and        assembly houses.

Although discussed hereinabove with reference to communication filters,it will be appreciated that thickness-shear-based Composite FBARs andsurface generated acoustic wave-based Composite FBARs are also used inother applications. For example they are widely used in biosensors sincethey provide high sensitivity for the detection of biomolecules inliquids.

Thus persons skilled in the art will appreciate that the presentinvention is not limited to what has been particularly shown anddescribed hereinabove. Rather the scope of the present invention isdefined by the appended claims and includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove as well asvariations and modifications thereof, which would occur to personsskilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.

In the claims, the word “comprise”, and variations thereof such as“comprises”, “comprising” and the like indicate that the componentslisted are included, but not generally to the exclusion of othercomponents.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A filter package comprising an array ofpiezoelectric films sandwiched between an array of upper electrodes andlower electrodes: the individual piezoelectric films and the upperelectrodes being separated by a passivation material; the lowerelectrode being coupled to an interposer with a first cavity between thelower electrodes and the interposer; the filter package furthercomprising a silicon wafer of known thickness attached over the upperelectrodes with an array of upper cavities between the silicon wafer anda silicon cover; each upper cavity aligned with a piezoelectric film inthe array of piezoelectric films, the upper cavities having side wallscomprising the passivation material.
 2. The filter package of claim 1,wherein the piezoelectric films comprise Ba_(x)Sr_((1-x))TiO₃ (BST). 3.The filter package of claim 1, wherein the piezoelectric films eachcomprise a single crystal.
 4. The filter package of claim 1 wherein thelower electrodes comprise aluminum.
 5. The filter package of claim 4wherein edges of the lower electrodes are stiffened by an under bumpmetallization material comprising a titanium adhesion layer followed byat least one of tungsten and tantalum.
 6. The filter package of claim 1wherein the lower electrode is coupled to the interposer by soldertipped copper pillars.
 7. The filter package of claim 6 wherein an underbump metallization material comprising tungsten or tantalum connects thelower electrode to the copper pillars.
 8. The filter package of claim 1wherein the upper electrodes comprise aluminum.
 9. The filter package ofclaim 1, wherein the passivation material comprises either polyimide orBenzocyclobutene (BCB).
 10. The filter package of claim 1 furthercomprising a first adhesion layer of titanium between the piezoelectricmembrane and the lower electrode.
 11. The filter package of claim 10wherein the first adhesion layer comprises titanium.
 12. The filterpackage of claim 1 wherein the silicon wafer is attached to the upperelectrode by an adhesion layer adjacent to the upper electrode, abonding layer and a further adhesion layer attached to the silicon waferthereby creating a composite electrode.
 13. The filter package of claim12 wherein the adhesion layer and further adhesion layer comprise Tihaving a thickness in the range of 5 nm to 50 nm with 5% tolerances. 14.The filter package of claim 13 wherein the bonding layer is selectedfrom the group comprising Au—In alloy, Au and AlN.
 15. The filterpackage of claim 1 wherein the silicon wafer has a thickness in therange of 1 micron to 10 microns and is coupled to the silicon cover bythe passivation material and/or silicon oxide.
 16. The filter package ofclaim 15 wherein the silicon cover is 90 microns thick.
 17. The filterpackage of claim 1 encapsulated in polymer overfill, wherein a barrierbetween the filter array and the interposer provides a perimeter wall ofthe lower cavity, wherein said barrier comprises at least one of an SU8gasket around the filter array that is attached to the lower electrodeand an epoxy dam attached to the interposer.
 18. The filter package ofclaim 1, wherein the interposer comprises at least one via layer and onerouting layer of copper encapsulated a dielectric matrix.
 19. The filterpackage of claim 18, wherein the interposer comprises a polymer matrixselected from the group consisting of polyimide, epoxy, BT(Bismaleimide/Triazine), Polyphenylene Ether (PPE), Polyphenylene Oxide(PPO) and their blends.
 20. The filter package of claim 19, wherein theinterposer further comprises glass fibers and/or ceramic fillers.